Jun
15

Like Star Trek for its realism?

Science & Technology

Seems like someone is clearly mistaken:

<omega> i like star trek because it’s actually pretty realistic. the technology is fiction, but it follows real physics
<Kuiper> In Star Trek, whenever there are torpedoes or phaser fire hitting a ship, you can hear the explosions even though they’re in space. How is that “real physics?”
<omega> in space, explosions are actually louder
<omega> because there is no air to get in the way
<omega> dumbass (Source)

Imagine a film trying to be realistic and offer absolutely no sound effect in space. Probably made a pretty boring film that could’ve belong to the silent film era.

Tags: , , , , ,

One comment for “Like Star Trek for its realism?”

  1. The film “2001, A Space Odyssey” was perhaps the most true to physics of all SF films. While not full of noise, it does have a few chilling silent scenes of death and destruction. Its fidelity to physics does not seem to have hurt its acceptance as a great, even classic movie.

    by David Spector (Sep 9, 2008 at 9 PM)
 

Leave a Reply

 

Comments may be moderated due to spam. No advertisements are allowed in comments.

You'll require some math knowledge to comment, this is done to stop evil bots from spamming my blog.

Read my comments policy

Want a display picture?